|
Alfred E. Stillman M.D. Robert Painter M.D. and
David W. Hollister M.D.
Day Kimball Hospital, Putnam, Connecticut
Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type IV is a heritable disease
of type II collagen metabolism. This diagnosis is suspected in a
patient with a combination of clinical manifestations and family
history, but it is confirmed only by culture of the patient's skin
fibroblasts and demonstration of a defect in type III collagen
metabolism. The disease may rarely present with spontaneous colonic
perforation, a complication traditionally treated by primary closure of
the perforated segment and creation of an end colostomy. Attempts at
bowel reanastomosis have often resulted in repeated colon perforations.
We present the first patient with Ehlers-Danlos type IV syndrome to
develop a colon perforation proximal to an end colostomy, and discuss
the surgical strategy to prevent recurrences of this and other
post-operative complications associated with the syndrome.
Introduction
Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (EDS) is a heterogeneous group of inherited
diseases of which only three (EDS types IV, VI, and VII) have been
shown to be due to defects of collagen metabolism defects, but there
are no conclusive data to support this inference. Patients with EDS
type IV (ED IV), a disease of collagen type III metabolism, have the
most severe manifestations, the most dramatic of which are rupture of
major arteries and hollow internal organs at a relatively early age
(2). Spontaneous bowel perforation is a rare but particularly
troublesome complication of ED IV because of its tendency to recur
despite aggressive surgical management.
We present a unique patient with documented ED IV and
multiple episodes of colon perforation, the last of which occurred
proximal to a protective end colostomy. This is the first reported
instance of perforation proximal to such a colostomy in ED IV patients.
This patient's experience forms the basis for a discussion of the
recognition and diagnosis of ED IV and new recommendations for the
surgical management of spontaneous colon perforation in these patients.
Case Report
A 32 year old man was hospitalized with sudden onset of left lower
quadrant pain which spread rapidly over his entire abdomen. On physical
examination, there was marked guarding and rebound tenderness; bowel
sounds were absent. His white blood count was 26,000 with a marked left
shift. An abdominal film demonstrated free intraperitoneal air.
Laparotomy revealed a sigmoid perforation for which sigmoid colectomy
and end colostomy were performed, and a Hartmann pouch was created.
Examination of the colon at surgery and by the pathologist revealed
that the perforation had occurred in previously normal bowel. The
colostomy was reanastomosed 2 months later. Surgery was complicated by
excessive bleeding at the site of colostomy closure. The same symptoms
and physical signs recurred 2 years later. Repeat laparotomy revealed
another sigmoid perforation, for which, again, a sigmoid colectomy and
end colostomy were performed and a Hartmann pouch created. Again,
perforation had occurred in apparently normal bowel. This time there
was no plan to close the colostomy.
Because of the patient's additional history of clubfoot
at birth (previously corrected) and two spontaneous pneumothoraces at
ages 17 and 30 years, the possibility of EDS was considered. The
diagnosis was confirmed when the patient's cultured skin fibroblasts
were shown to have intracellular accumulation and modestly decreased
secretion of type III collagen. Type I collagen metabolism was normal.
He was seen again 1 year later with sudden onset of
severe abdominal pain, rigidity, and rebound tenderness; his colostomy
would not admit the tip of the examiner's fifth finger. At surgery, a
perforation 13 cm from the end colostomy was found, and a left
colectomy and colostomy revision were performed. However, the patient
was re-explored several hours later when he became hypotensive. Massive
intra-abdominal bleeding due to multiple small arterial bleeding points
was found and repaired. Three months later, severe abdominal pain and
vomiting led to re-exploration, with discovery and lysis of massive
adhesions producing small bowel obstruction.
None of the patient's bower perforations had been
traumatically produced. He denied a history of gay or bisexual behavior
and had not inserted foreign objects into his rectum or colostomy.
There was no family history suggestive of EDS. Interim physical
examination had revealed uniformly thin skin with unusually prominent
veins but normal skin extensibility. The small joints of his hands
showed minimal hyperextensibility but other joints were normal.
Discussion
The diagnosis of ED IV depends on a combination of clinical
manifestations, family history, and demonstration of quantitative
and/or qualitative defects in type III collagen metabolism. In common
with other EDS types, ED IV patients have skin and joint
manifestations; however, they are not generally as severe as those seen
in the majority of other EDS subjects. Unlike other EDS types, patients
with ED IV do not have hyperextensible skin, and only the small joints
of their hands are hyperextensible. However, the skin of ED IV patients
is particularly thin, permitting visualization of the venous pattern
over the anterior trunk. Easy skin bruisability is also characteristic
of ED IV. The association of both club foot and spontaneous
pneumothorax with ED IV has also been noted.
The diagnosis of ED IV is often difficult and may be
made especially so by the appearance of acute abdominal pain due to
major complications of spontaneous rupture of major arteries,
spontaneous bowel perforation, and rarely, rupture of the uterus near
term in pregnancy. Arterial rupture is rare before the third decade,
whereas uterine rupture generally doesn't occur before the fourth
decade. Bowel perforations usually occur between the late teens and
early forties, but rare cases have occurred in childhood. The colon has
been involved almost exclusively; most cases have occurred in the
sigmoid. Ominously, perforations often recur after either simple
closure or after reanastomosis of a colostomy performed to
defunctionalize the perforated bowel segment. This tendency has
resulted in recommendations to maintain a permanent colostomy or
eventually to perform a subtotal colectomy with construction of an
ileoproctostomy or cecoproctostomy (to preserve the ileocecal valve)
because spontaneous rectal perforations in ED IV have been rare. Stool
softeners have also been considered an important therapeutic adjunct.
Our patient is the first reported instance of
spontaneous colon perforation in ED IV that has occurred with a
colostomy in place. This perforation apparently occurred due to
pressure proximal to a stenotic colostomy stoma and was probably
unrelated to ED IV per se. However, an end colostomy can no longer be
considered a guarantee against colon perforation in ED IV patients and
must always be watched for developing stomal stenosis. Perhaps the most
simple and safe life-saving surgical procedure would be a one-stage
subtotal colectomy with construction of a Hartmann pouch or mucus
fistula and permanent ileostomy. Should diversion colitis appear in the
excluded rectosigmoid segment, a mucus fistula would offer a convenient
stoma for therapy with short chain fatty acids or other agents. More
extensive surgery, such as initial primary closure of the perforated
segment and end colostomy construction followed by subtotal colectomy
and ileoproctostomy, might increase in these patients the already
formidable incidence of excessive bleeding disruption of sutures, and
wound dehiscence without increasing their benefit. The risk of
dehiscence can be decreased by use of stay sutures placed at a distance
from the incision and by decreasing intra-abdominal pressure (i.e.,
prophylaxis against ileus, cough, bladder outlet obstruction).
ED IV is genetically heterogeneous. Most subjects have
an autosomal dominant inheritance; recessive inheritance is rare.
However, in common with several other lethal genetically transmitted
conditions manifest at a young age, spontaneous mutations may occur
too. Ultimate proof depends on culture of the patient's skin
fibroblasts and demonstration of defects in the steps of type III
collagen synthesis and secretion.
|